In collaborative work, control rarely announces itself. It appears when I explain my idea until there is no room left, correct another person’s contribution too quickly or quietly turn a shared document back into my document.
Silence makes the pattern visible
Paired Drawing appears on print pages 69 and 70 of Putting Improv to Work by Greg Hohn. Two people create faces together without speaking, taking turns to add one part. They finish by naming each face one letter at a time.
The activity is simple, but silence removes the usual tools for control. I cannot explain the picture I have in mind or persuade my partner to follow it. I can only notice what is present and make the next contribution.
That creates a useful question: am I helping one picture emerge, or am I trying to rescue the private picture in my head?
Co creation begins when the shared result matters more than proving what I originally meant.
An unfinished mark is an offer
A line on paper may become an eyebrow, a cloud or the edge of a machine. Its meaning is not fully controlled by the person who drew it. The partner’s response changes what the first mark becomes.
The same is true of an early proposal at work. The person who offers it may imagine one solution, but finance, operations or technology can add information that changes its shape.
If the original author protects every detail, the group can only approve or reject. If the offer remains open, the group can build.
Notice the urge to repair
Some participants draw around a partner’s contribution to make it fit their own intention. Others stop adding boldly because they are afraid of damaging the picture. Both reactions contain useful information.
In a project, repair can look like rewriting a colleague’s section without asking or adding so many qualifications that their idea disappears. Caution can look like waiting for the senior person to define everything.
The exercise gives both habits a harmless place to appear. The debrief can then name them without accusing anyone of being a difficult collaborator.
Use it before shared design work
I would run this before a session where people need to shape a process, customer journey or workshop together. The drawing does not solve the business problem. It prepares the group to recognise how they share ownership.
After the original face version, I add one workplace round. Pairs draw a fictional customer journey or future team space one element at a time. They still cannot speak until the picture is complete.
The result will not be a process model. It will reveal how quickly assumptions, ownership and interpretation enter even a very small act of creation.
Browse all improv exercises for listening, creativity, collaboration and leadership
Sources used
- Main citationPutting Improv to Work: Spontaneous Performance for Professional and Personal Life by Greg Hohn. Paired Drawing and its silent, alternating creation of faces and names, print pages 69 and 70.View the book on Amazon.de (paid link / bezahlter Link)

Max Grillo is an applied improvisation facilitator. He has participated in more than 700 improv workshops and accumulated more than 10,000 hours of improv practice. He co-manages and co-hosts Rice Cookie Improv, is cofounder of Monday Flow Improv and is a member of the Applied Improvisation Network. He has facilitated improv in Munich since 2017 and brings more than 25 years of experience in technology and transformation.
More about Max