In a busy meeting, people can speak into the room rather than to another person. A question is answered before the asker finishes. A new topic begins while the previous speaker is still looking for acknowledgement. The words continue, but the connection is uncertain.
Communication needs a receiver
A contribution is not complete simply because it was spoken. Someone needs to receive enough of it to respond. This sounds obvious, yet speed, remote calls and crowded agendas make it easy to treat speaking as the main task.
I notice this most at functional boundaries. Technology explains a constraint to finance, finance names a reporting need and operations describes an exception. Each statement may be valid, but the group moves on without showing that the information changed anyone’s understanding.
A short physical rule can make the missing connection impossible to ignore.
Before I add another contribution, I can show who I am responding to and what I received.
The source and an inclusive adaptation
Touch to Talk and Eye Contact to Speak appears in Yes, And by Kelly Leonard and Tom Yorton, with the exercise indexed at print page 206. Partners establish physical or strong visual contact before they speak.
For my workshops, touch is never required and direct eye contact is not the only valid sign of attention. Participants can use a name, an open palm, a nod, body orientation or another agreed cue. The principle is connection, not compliance with one physical behaviour.
Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information by Izzy Gesell describes connection and acknowledgement as parts of full body listening. That is the source of my broader adaptation.
Why the pause matters
The cue creates a small delay. In that delay, the speaker has to notice whether the other person is available. The listener has to acknowledge that a contribution is arriving.
Some pairs discover that they usually overlap. Others realise that their signal is too subtle or that they look away while preparing a response. The point is not to remove natural conversation. It is to create one exaggerated round that reveals the pattern.
When the rule disappears, most people keep a little more awareness of the receiver. That lighter behaviour is what can travel back to work.
Use the idea in real meetings
A natural workplace version might begin, ‘Building on Elena’s reporting point,’ or, ‘I want to check that I understood the operational impact before I answer.’ On a remote call, saying the person’s name can establish the connection that physical orientation normally provides.
This does not mean every sentence needs a formal handover. Use it when the conversation is fast, several functions are present or a contribution could easily be separated from the concern it answers.
Sources used
- Yes, And by Kelly Leonard and Tom Yorton. Touch to Talk and Eye Contact to Speak exercise, indexed at print page 206, and its focus on attention and communication.
- Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information by Izzy Gesell. The sections on connection, acknowledgement and full body listening.

Max Grillo is an applied improvisation facilitator. He manages and hosts Rice Cookie Improv, is cofounder of Monday Flow Improv and is a member of the Applied Improvisation Network. He combines workshop practice with more than 25 years of experience in technology and transformation.
More about Max