A facilitator asks for a volunteer. The room becomes very interested in its notebooks. Nothing is wrong with the people in the room. Several private calculations have simply started at the same time.
The pause contains more information than it seems
I recognise the pause from both sides. As a participant, I may wonder whether I understand the task, whether volunteering will look eager or whether I will be trapped at the front for ten minutes. As a facilitator, I may read the silence as resistance when the group is actually assessing risk.
Then one person moves. The emotional climate changes. Other people often relax, smile or become more willing to join the next round.
That small moment is useful because it separates the external invitation from the internal story each person creates around it.
Initiative often begins before certainty, with one person making the next step easier for everyone else.
The sequence and its source
On page 6 of Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information, Izzy Gesell describes asking a group for a volunteer and then exploring the self talk of the people who remained seated and the person who stepped forward.
Gesell then asks how the group felt when someone volunteered. The volunteer is framed as a leader because their action changes the emotional climate for other participants.
I like the concreteness of this sequence. Leadership is not presented as a speech or a personality. It is one visible action and the effect that action has on the room.
Do not turn volunteering into a moral test
A person who does not volunteer has not failed a leadership test. They may need clarity, have a valid boundary or know that somebody else is better placed. Power, culture, language and past experiences all influence what an invitation means.
The facilitator must make the task bounded, allow a genuine pass and avoid praising one person by shaming the rest. The learning comes from examining the different stories, not deciding which person was brave.
I also ask what made the invitation easier or harder. Initiative is partly personal, but the design of the room matters. Clear purpose, limited risk and visible support make action more likely.
What going first looks like at work
Going first might mean naming uncertainty in a steering meeting, sharing an unfinished idea, asking the question that everyone is avoiding or reporting a mistake before its impact grows.
In technology and transformation work, I value the person who makes useful reality visible early. Their action gives others permission to add information instead of maintaining an image of control.
A leader can cultivate this by reducing the cost of the first step. Ask for one observation, not a complete solution. Invite a small reversible test, not a permanent commitment. Respond to early information with curiosity before judgement.
Sources used
- Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information by Izzy Gesell. Page 6, the volunteer and self talk sequence and the discussion of action changing a group’s emotional climate.

Max Grillo is an applied improvisation facilitator. He manages and hosts Rice Cookie Improv, is cofounder of Monday Flow Improv and is a member of the Applied Improvisation Network. He combines workshop practice with more than 25 years of experience in technology and transformation.
More about Max