I have seen good ideas arrive in meetings wearing too much armour. The person explains every detail, anticipates every objection and defends choices nobody has challenged yet. By the time the idea is available to the group, it is already difficult to touch.

An unfinished idea can feel personally risky

In expert environments, people are rewarded for preparation and accuracy. Offering something incomplete can feel careless. The safer move is to wait or to present a fully protected answer.

That safety has a cost. Other people can comment on a complete proposal, but they have less room to shape it. The idea remains associated with one owner, and every change can feel like criticism.

I use physical co creation because a pose cannot explain or defend itself. It enters the room, becomes part of a larger picture and eventually loses its individual ownership.

An idea becomes easier to build when it does not have to prove its value before anyone else can touch it.

The exercise and its source

Thank You Statues appears in Yes, And by Kelly Leonard and Tom Yorton, with the exercise indexed at print page 136. Participants first replace one person in the centre, receiving the place with a thank you. The activity then develops into a shared statue where each new pose builds on what is already present.

Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information by Izzy Gesell offers two principles that matter here: accept the offer and make your partner look good. I add a third facilitation reminder. Supporting an idea does not mean making every idea permanent.

A contribution can be accepted, changed and eventually released. That is what makes the practice useful for teams rather than merely pleasant.

What this reveals about ownership

Some people search for a pose that is clever enough. Others enter quickly but ignore the shape already there. Some create a strong contribution and then watch anxiously as later participants change its meaning.

I recognise the same moments in design work. A proposal may begin as a billing idea, gain an operational element, change through a customer need and become something nobody could have owned at the start.

The debrief helps participants separate authorship from value. My contribution can matter even when the final result no longer looks like my original intention.

Create a safer route from play to work

I do not move directly from a statue into the team’s most political topic. First, the group names the behaviours that helped: entering, observing, connecting, leaving space and letting meaning emerge.

Then we use a low risk business question. Participants offer one sentence each, but nobody may explain or defend their sentence until the group has built a complete possibility.

Evaluation comes afterwards. Acceptance opens the material. Judgement selects what the organisation should actually do.

Sources used

  • Yes, And by Kelly Leonard and Tom Yorton. Thank You Statues exercise, indexed at print page 136, and its focus on co creation, offering and supporting ideas.
  • Practiced Spontaneity: Resources, Theory and Supplemental Information by Izzy Gesell. The guiding principles of accepting offers and making a partner look good.
About the author

Max Grillo is an applied improvisation facilitator. He manages and hosts Rice Cookie Improv, is cofounder of Monday Flow Improv and is a member of the Applied Improvisation Network. He combines workshop practice with more than 25 years of experience in technology and transformation.

More about Max